AlphaStocks

DBD vs ROP

As of Sep 20, 2026, DIEBOLD NIXDORF (DBD) scores 6.8/10 and Roper Technologies (ROP) 5.0/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so DBD scores higher. DBD trades 13% above its model fair value; ROP trades 21% below its model fair value.

DBD

DIEBOLD NIXDORF, Inc

6.8

Consider Buy

$63.32

ROP

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC

5.0

Consider Buy

$372.76

DBD vs ROP: Which is the Better Investment?

DIEBOLD NIXDORF, Inc (DBD) scores 6.8/10 while ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC (ROP) scores 5.0/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. DIEBOLD NIXDORF, Inc has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, DIEBOLD NIXDORF, Inc trades at 24.9x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricDBDROP
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score6.8/105.0/10
RatingConsider BuyConsider Buy
Price$63.32$372.76
P/E Ratio24.926.3
ROE8.6%7.7%
Market Cap$2B$39B
Fair Value$56.16$470.97
Dividend Yield0.9%
Sector Rank#37 of 205#122 of 205
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongAttractive
BuffettAttractiveNeutral
GrahamCautionNeutral
LynchAttractiveNeutral
GreenblattStrongNeutral
View full DBDanalysis →View full ROPanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

DBD vs ROP: Which Stock Scores Higher?

DIEBOLD NIXDORF, Inc (DBD) and ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC (ROP) are both in the Information Technology sector. DBD currently leads with a composite score of 6.8/10 (Consider Buy) compared to ROP's 5.0/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer