AlphaStocks

CUBE vs TRNO

As of Sep 20, 2026, CubeSmart (CUBE) scores 4.6/10 and Terreno Realty (TRNO) 5.9/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so TRNO scores higher. CUBE trades in line with its model fair value; TRNO trades 52% above its model fair value.

CUBE

CubeSmart

4.6

Weak

$39.55

TRNO

Terreno Realty Corp

5.9

Consider Buy

$65.74

CUBE vs TRNO: Which is the Better Investment?

CubeSmart (CUBE) scores 4.6/10 while Terreno Realty Corp (TRNO) scores 5.9/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Terreno Realty Corp has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricCUBETRNO
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score4.6/105.9/10
RatingWeakConsider Buy
Price$39.55$65.74
P/E Ratio16.8
ROE9.9%
Market Cap$9B$7B
Fair Value$39.53$43.20
Dividend Yield2.9%
Sector Rank#57 of 104#21 of 104
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiNeutralAttractive
BuffettAttractiveAttractive
GrahamNeutralAttractive
LynchNeutralStrong
GreenblattLimited DataLimited Data
View full CUBEanalysis →View full TRNOanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

CUBE vs TRNO: Which Stock Scores Higher?

CubeSmart (CUBE) and Terreno Realty Corp (TRNO) are both in the Real Estate sector. TRNO currently leads with a composite score of 5.9/10 (Consider Buy) compared to CUBE's 4.6/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer