AlphaStocks

CRWD vs NTAP

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. vs NetApp, Inc. — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

CRWD

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

1.4

Avoid

$211.17

NTAP

NetApp, Inc.

8.4

Strong Buy

$190.47

CRWD vs NTAP: Which is the Better Investment?

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) scores 1.4/10 while NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NetApp, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricCRWDNTAP
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score1.4/108.4/10
RatingAvoidStrong Buy
Price$211.17$190.47
P/E Ratio30.0
ROE-3.8%101.7%
Market Cap$54B$38B
Fair Value$256.81
Dividend Yield1.2%
Sector Rank#1102 of 1123#3 of 1123
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiNeutralStrong
BuffettCautionStrong
GrahamCautionCaution
LynchLimited DataNeutral
GreenblattCautionNeutral
View full CRWDanalysis →View full NTAPanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

CRWD vs NTAP: Which Stock Scores Higher?

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) are among the most compared stocks in the Information Technology sector. NTAP currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to CRWD's 1.4/10 (Avoid).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer