CPB vs GIS
As of Sep 20, 2026, CAMPBELL'S (CPB) scores 5.9/10 and General Mills (GIS) 4.2/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so CPB scores higher. GIS trades 33% below its model fair value.
CPB
CAMPBELL'S Co
5.9
Consider Buy
$20.68
GIS
GENERAL MILLS INC
4.2
Weak
$36.34
CPB vs GIS: Which is the Better Investment?
CAMPBELL'S Co (CPB) scores 5.9/10 while GENERAL MILLS INC (GIS) scores 4.2/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. CAMPBELL'S Co has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CPB | GIS |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 5.9/10▲ | 4.2/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy▲ | Weak |
| Price | $20.68 | $36.34 |
| P/E Ratio | 10.3 | — |
| ROE | 15.5%▲ | -1.0% |
| Market Cap | $6B | $20B |
| Fair Value | — | $54.27 |
| Dividend Yield | 7.1%▲ | 6.5% |
| Sector Rank | #13 of 78▲ | #48 of 78 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong▲ | Attractive |
| Buffett | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
| Graham | Neutral▲ | Caution |
| Lynch | Neutral | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Strong | Strong |
Related comparisons
CPB vs GIS: Which Stock Scores Higher?
CAMPBELL'S Co (CPB) and GENERAL MILLS INC (GIS) are both in the Consumer Staples sector. CPB currently leads with a composite score of 5.9/10 (Consider Buy) compared to GIS's 4.2/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer