AlphaStocks

COKE vs MNST

As of Sep 20, 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE) scores 5.8/10 and Monster Beverage (MNST) 3.3/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so COKE scores higher. COKE trades 2% below its model fair value; MNST trades in line with its model fair value.

COKE

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

5.8

Consider Buy

$192.28

MNST

Monster Beverage Corp

3.3

Weak

$44.68

COKE vs MNST: Which is the Better Investment?

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) scores 5.8/10 while Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) scores 3.3/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, Monster Beverage Corp trades at 23.1x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricCOKEMNST
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score5.8/103.3/10
RatingConsider BuyWeak
Price$192.28$44.68
P/E Ratio28.223.1
ROE140.6%20.9%
Market Cap$13B$44B
Fair Value$196.14$44.83
Dividend Yield0.6%
Sector Rank#17 of 78#65 of 77
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveStrong
BuffettAttractiveAttractive
GrahamNeutralCaution
LynchNeutralNeutral
GreenblattAttractiveLimited Data
View full COKEanalysis →View full MNSTanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

COKE vs MNST: Which Stock Scores Higher?

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) are both in the Consumer Staples sector. COKE currently leads with a composite score of 5.8/10 (Consider Buy) compared to MNST's 3.3/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer