CMG vs EAT
As of Sep 20, 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) scores 5.8/10 and Brinker International (EAT) 7.2/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so EAT scores higher. CMG trades 1% above its model fair value; EAT trades 16% below its model fair value.
CMG
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC
5.8
Consider Buy
$33.43
EAT
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC
7.2
Consider Buy
$196.75
CMG vs EAT: Which is the Better Investment?
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC (CMG) scores 5.8/10 while BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) scores 7.2/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC trades at 23.7x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CMG | EAT |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 5.8/10 | 7.2/10▲ |
| Rating | Consider Buy | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $33.43 | $196.75 |
| P/E Ratio | 29.2 | 23.7▲ |
| ROE | 50.8% | 53.7%▲ |
| Market Cap | $44B | $9B |
| Fair Value | $33.24 | $234.41 |
| Dividend Yield | — | — |
| Sector Rank | #53 of 194 | #13 of 194▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Attractive | Attractive |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Strong▲ | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Attractive | Attractive |
Related comparisons
CMG vs EAT: Which Stock Scores Higher?
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC (CMG) and BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT) are both in the Consumer Discretionary sector. EAT currently leads with a composite score of 7.2/10 (Consider Buy) compared to CMG's 5.8/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer