CHDN vs FTI
As of Sep 20, 2026, Churchill Downs (CHDN) scores 3.6/10 and TechnipFMC (FTI) 6.6/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so FTI scores higher. CHDN trades 15% below its model fair value; FTI trades 45% above its model fair value.
CHDN
Churchill Downs Inc
3.6
Weak
$81.94
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
6.6
Consider Buy
$72.07
CHDN vs FTI: Which is the Better Investment?
Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN) scores 3.6/10 while TechnipFMC plc (FTI) scores 6.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. TechnipFMC plc has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, Churchill Downs Inc trades at 15.4x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Churchill Downs Inc trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CHDN | FTI |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 3.6/10 | 6.6/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $81.94 | $72.07 |
| P/E Ratio | 15.4▲ | 31.4 |
| ROE | 37.4%▲ | 28.8% |
| Market Cap | $6B | $30B |
| Fair Value | $96.91 | $49.72 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.5% | — |
| Sector Rank | #146 of 194 | #12 of 80▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Caution | Strong▲ |
| Greenblatt | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
Related comparisons
CHDN vs FTI: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN) is in the Consumer Discretionary sector; TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is in Energy. FTI currently leads with a composite score of 6.6/10 (Consider Buy) compared to CHDN's 3.6/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer