CDNS vs CRM
As of Sep 20, 2026, Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) scores 3.4/10 and Salesforce (CRM) 7.7/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so CRM scores higher. CDNS trades 73% above its model fair value; CRM trades 28% below its model fair value.
CDNS
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC
3.4
Weak
$282.82
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
7.7
Strong Buy
$237.91
CDNS vs CRM: Which is the Better Investment?
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC (CDNS) scores 3.4/10 while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) scores 7.7/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Salesforce, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, Salesforce, Inc. trades at 30.5x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Salesforce, Inc. trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CDNS | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 3.4/10 | 7.7/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $282.82 | $237.91 |
| P/E Ratio | 69.7 | 30.5▲ |
| ROE | 16.1%▲ | 10.9% |
| Market Cap | $77B | $207B |
| Fair Value | $163.89 | $331.88 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.0% |
| Sector Rank | #179 of 205 | #7 of 205▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Neutral▲ |
Related comparisons
CDNS vs CRM: Which Stock Scores Higher?
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC (CDNS) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) are both in the Information Technology sector. CRM currently leads with a composite score of 7.7/10 (Strong Buy) compared to CDNS's 3.4/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer