CARR vs MAS
As of Sep 20, 2026, CARRIER GLOBAL (CARR) scores 4.8/10 and Masco (MAS) 6.3/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so MAS scores higher. CARR trades 33% above its model fair value; MAS trades 36% below its model fair value.
CARR
CARRIER GLOBAL Corp
4.8
Weak
$53.87
MAS
MASCO CORP /DE/
6.3
Consider Buy
$68.09
CARR vs MAS: Which is the Better Investment?
CARRIER GLOBAL Corp (CARR) scores 4.8/10 while MASCO CORP /DE/ (MAS) scores 6.3/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. MASCO CORP /DE/ has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, MASCO CORP /DE/ trades at 17.6x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. MASCO CORP /DE/ trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | CARR | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 4.8/10 | 6.3/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $53.87 | $68.09 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.3 | 17.6▲ |
| ROE | 10.2%▲ | -616.0% |
| Market Cap | $45B | $14B |
| Fair Value | $40.49 | $105.94 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.3% | 1.6%▲ |
| Sector Rank | #125 of 265 | #29 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong▲ | Attractive |
| Buffett | Attractive | Attractive |
| Graham | Caution | Neutral▲ |
| Lynch | Caution | Neutral▲ |
| Greenblatt | Attractive | Attractive |
Related comparisons
CARR vs MAS: Which Stock Scores Higher?
CARRIER GLOBAL Corp (CARR) and MASCO CORP /DE/ (MAS) are both in the Industrials sector. MAS currently leads with a composite score of 6.3/10 (Consider Buy) compared to CARR's 4.8/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer