BOOT vs ROST
As of Sep 20, 2026, Boot Barn Holdings (BOOT) scores 4.4/10 and Ross Stores (ROST) 5.1/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so ROST scores higher. BOOT trades 33% below its model fair value; ROST trades 28% above its model fair value.
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
4.4
Weak
$123.05
ROST
ROSS STORES, INC.
5.1
Consider Buy
$226.60
BOOT vs ROST: Which is the Better Investment?
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) scores 4.4/10 while ROSS STORES, INC. (ROST) scores 5.1/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. ROSS STORES, INC. has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. trades at 16.7x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | BOOT | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 4.4/10 | 5.1/10▲ |
| Rating | Weak | Consider Buy▲ |
| Price | $123.05 | $226.60 |
| P/E Ratio | 16.7▲ | 34.3 |
| ROE | 17.4% | 35.5%▲ |
| Market Cap | $4B | $73B |
| Fair Value | $183.59 | $177.14 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.7% |
| Sector Rank | #111 of 194 | #80 of 194▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Attractive |
| Buffett | Attractive | Attractive |
| Graham | Caution | Neutral▲ |
| Lynch | Attractive | Attractive |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Neutral▲ |
Related comparisons
BOOT vs ROST: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and ROSS STORES, INC. (ROST) are both in the Consumer Discretionary sector. ROST currently leads with a composite score of 5.1/10 (Consider Buy) compared to BOOT's 4.4/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer