AlphaStocks

BC vs VAL

As of Sep 20, 2026, Brunswick (BC) scores 2.5/10 and Valaris (VAL) 4.6/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so VAL scores higher. BC trades 18% below its model fair value.

BC

BRUNSWICK CORP

2.5

Avoid

$67.47

VAL

Valaris Ltd

4.6

Weak

$83.77

BC vs VAL: Which is the Better Investment?

BRUNSWICK CORP (BC) scores 2.5/10 while Valaris Ltd (VAL) scores 4.6/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Valaris Ltd has the higher composite rating of Weak.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricBCVAL
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score2.5/104.6/10
RatingAvoidWeak
Price$67.47$83.77
P/E Ratio6.0
ROE-4.1%35.0%
Market Cap$4B$6B
Fair Value$82.57
Dividend Yield2.2%
Sector Rank#181 of 194#37 of 80
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveStrong
BuffettCautionAttractive
GrahamCautionNeutral
LynchAttractiveNeutral
GreenblattCautionAttractive
View full BCanalysis →View full VALanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

BC vs VAL: Which Stock Scores Higher?

BRUNSWICK CORP (BC) is in the Consumer Discretionary sector; Valaris Ltd (VAL) is in Energy. VAL currently leads with a composite score of 4.6/10 (Weak) compared to BC's 2.5/10 (Avoid).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer