AlphaStocks

BAX vs BDX

As of Sep 20, 2026, Baxter International (BAX) scores 5.5/10 and Becton Dickinson (BDX) 6.7/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so BDX scores higher. BDX trades 21% above its model fair value.

BAX

BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC

5.5

Consider Buy

$22.79

BDX

BECTON DICKINSON & CO

6.7

Consider Buy

$180.78

BAX vs BDX: Which is the Better Investment?

BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC (BAX) scores 5.5/10 while BECTON DICKINSON & CO (BDX) scores 6.7/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. BECTON DICKINSON & CO has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricBAXBDX
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score5.5/106.7/10
RatingConsider BuyConsider Buy
Price$22.79$180.78
P/E Ratio31.1
ROE-14.3%6.6%
Market Cap$12B$51B
Fair Value$149.03
Dividend Yield3.0%2.7%
Sector Rank#77 of 168#20 of 168
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiNeutralAttractive
BuffettCautionStrong
GrahamNeutralCaution
LynchNeutralCaution
GreenblattStrongStrong
View full BAXanalysis →View full BDXanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

BAX vs BDX: Which Stock Scores Higher?

BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC (BAX) and BECTON DICKINSON & CO (BDX) are both in the Health Care sector. BDX currently leads with a composite score of 6.7/10 (Consider Buy) compared to BAX's 5.5/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer