BABA vs NTAP
As of Sep 20, 2026, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) scores 2.6/10 and NetApp (NTAP) 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so NTAP scores higher. BABA trades 30% below its model fair value; NTAP trades 23% below its model fair value.
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
2.6
Avoid
$113.26
NTAP
NetApp, Inc.
8.4
Strong Buy
$197.73
BABA vs NTAP: Which is the Better Investment?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA) scores 2.6/10 while NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. NetApp, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd trades at 21.0x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | BABA | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 2.6/10 | 8.4/10▲ |
| Rating | Avoid | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $113.26 | $197.73 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.0▲ | 31.1 |
| ROE | 10.0% | 101.7%▲ |
| Market Cap | $2.2T | $40B |
| Fair Value | $161.09 | $256.81 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.6%▲ | 1.2% |
| Sector Rank | #194 of 205 | #1 of 205▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Neutral | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Neutral | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Limited Data | Neutral▲ |
Related comparisons
BABA vs NTAP: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA) and NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) are both in the Information Technology sector. NTAP currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to BABA's 2.6/10 (Avoid).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer