AlphaStocks

AZN vs PARR

As of Sep 20, 2026, Astrazeneca (AZN) scores 5.0/10 and Par Pacific Holdings (PARR) 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so PARR scores higher. AZN trades 14% below its model fair value; PARR trades 26% below its model fair value.

AZN

ASTRAZENECA PLC

5.0

Consider Buy

$166.29

PARR

PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC.

8.4

Strong Buy

$84.38

AZN vs PARR: Which is the Better Investment?

ASTRAZENECA PLC (AZN) scores 5.0/10 while PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR) scores 8.4/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. trades at 11.8x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricAZNPARR
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score5.0/108.4/10
RatingConsider BuyStrong Buy
Price$166.29$84.38
P/E Ratio25.411.8
ROE21.9%25.4%
Market Cap$260B$4B
Fair Value$192.63$114.00
Dividend Yield1.9%
Sector Rank#111 of 168#2 of 80
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongStrong
BuffettStrongStrong
GrahamCautionCaution
LynchNeutralStrong
GreenblattNeutralAttractive
View full AZNanalysis →View full PARRanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

AZN vs PARR: Which Stock Scores Higher?

ASTRAZENECA PLC (AZN) is in the Health Care sector; PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR) is in Energy. PARR currently leads with a composite score of 8.4/10 (Strong Buy) compared to AZN's 5.0/10 (Consider Buy).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer