AXTA vs FUL
As of Sep 20, 2026, Axalta Coating Systems (AXTA) scores 6.8/10 and Fuller H B (FUL) 3.8/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so AXTA scores higher. AXTA trades 9% below its model fair value; FUL trades 6% below its model fair value.
AXTA
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.
6.8
Consider Buy
$32.21
FUL
FULLER H B CO
3.8
Weak
$49.35
AXTA vs FUL: Which is the Better Investment?
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) scores 6.8/10 while FULLER H B CO (FUL) scores 3.8/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, FULLER H B CO trades at 18.0x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | AXTA | FUL |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 6.8/10▲ | 3.8/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy▲ | Weak |
| Price | $32.21 | $49.35 |
| P/E Ratio | 18.4 | 18.0▲ |
| ROE | 16.4%▲ | 7.7% |
| Market Cap | $7B | $3B |
| Fair Value | $35.30 | $52.71 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.5% |
| Sector Rank | #5 of 78▲ | #52 of 78 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong | Strong |
| Buffett | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Neutral▲ | Caution |
| Greenblatt | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
Related comparisons
AXTA vs FUL: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and FULLER H B CO (FUL) are both in the Materials sector. AXTA currently leads with a composite score of 6.8/10 (Consider Buy) compared to FUL's 3.8/10 (Weak).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer