AVY vs CCK
As of Sep 20, 2026, Avery Dennison (AVY) scores 5.1/10 and Crown Holdings (CCK) 5.0/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so AVY scores higher. AVY trades 12% below its model fair value; CCK trades 13% below its model fair value.
AVY
Avery Dennison Corp
5.1
Consider Buy
$167.71
CCK
CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.
5.0
Consider Buy
$109.20
AVY vs CCK: Which is the Better Investment?
Avery Dennison Corp (AVY) scores 5.1/10 while CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. (CCK) scores 5.0/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Avery Dennison Corp has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. trades at 17.1x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. trades further below its estimated fair value.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | AVY | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 5.1/10▲ | 5.0/10 |
| Rating | Consider Buy▲ | Consider Buy |
| Price | $167.71 | $109.20 |
| P/E Ratio | 19.1 | 17.1▲ |
| ROE | 12.4% | 24.5%▲ |
| Market Cap | $13B | $12B |
| Fair Value | $190.75 | $125.24 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.3%▲ | 0.9% |
| Sector Rank | #26 of 78▲ | #32 of 78 |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Buffett | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
| Graham | Caution | Caution |
| Lynch | Neutral▲ | Caution |
| Greenblatt | Attractive | Strong▲ |
Related comparisons
AVY vs CCK: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Avery Dennison Corp (AVY) and CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. (CCK) are both in the Materials sector. AVY currently leads with a composite score of 5.1/10 (Consider Buy) compared to CCK's 5.0/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer