AlphaStocks

APP vs FTI

AppLovin Corp vs TechnipFMC plc — Side-by-Side Stock Comparison

APP

AppLovin Corp

4.8

Weak

$474.89

FTI

TechnipFMC plc

8.3

Strong Buy

$73.95

APP vs FTI: Which is the Better Investment?

AppLovin Corp (APP) scores 4.8/10 while TechnipFMC plc (FTI) scores 8.3/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. TechnipFMC plc has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, TechnipFMC plc trades at 32.2x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricAPPFTI
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score4.8/108.3/10
RatingWeakStrong Buy
Price$474.89$73.95
P/E Ratio48.732.2
ROE184.8%28.8%
Market Cap$161B$30B
Fair Value$405.26$49.72
Dividend Yield
Sector Rank#618 of 1126#3 of 1126
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiStrongStrong
BuffettStrongStrong
GrahamCautionCaution
LynchNeutralStrong
GreenblattCautionNeutral
View full APPanalysis →View full FTIanalysis →
Compare any two stocks →

APP vs FTI: Which Stock Scores Higher?

AppLovin Corp (APP) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI) are among the most compared stocks in the S&P 500. FTI currently leads with a composite score of 8.3/10 (Strong Buy) compared to APP's 4.8/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer