AlphaStocks

APLE vs RHP

As of Sep 20, 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT (APLE) scores 6.9/10 and Ryman Hospitality Properties (RHP) 4.7/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so APLE scores higher. APLE trades 35% below its model fair value; RHP trades 54% above its model fair value.

APLE

Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

6.9

Consider Buy

$15.57

RHP

Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.

4.7

Weak

$121.94

APLE vs RHP: Which is the Better Investment?

Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) scores 6.9/10 while Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) scores 4.7/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. has the higher composite rating of Consider Buy. On a P/E basis, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. trades at 21.1x, making it the more attractively priced of the two. Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. trades further below its estimated fair value.

This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.

MetricAPLERHP
Scores & Fundamentals
Composite Score6.9/104.7/10
RatingConsider BuyWeak
Price$15.57$121.94
P/E Ratio21.133.0
ROE3.7%32.3%
Market Cap$4B$8B
Fair Value$23.78$79.00
Dividend Yield6.1%3.4%
Sector Rank#6 of 104#55 of 104
Model Verdicts
PiotroskiAttractiveNeutral
BuffettStrongCaution
GrahamAttractiveCaution
LynchNeutralCaution
GreenblattCautionNeutral
View full APLEanalysis →View full RHPanalysis →

Related comparisons

Compare any two stocks →

APLE vs RHP: Which Stock Scores Higher?

Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) are both in the Real Estate sector. APLE currently leads with a composite score of 6.9/10 (Consider Buy) compared to RHP's 4.7/10 (Weak).

The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.

This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.

Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer