APAM vs BNY
As of Sep 20, 2026, Artisan Partners Asset Management (APAM) scores 5.8/10 and Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) 8.1/10 on AlphaStocks' five-model composite, so BNY scores higher. BNY trades 3% above its model fair value.
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
5.8
Consider Buy
$36.66
BNY
Bank of New York Mellon Corp
8.1
Strong Buy
$153.81
APAM vs BNY: Which is the Better Investment?
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) scores 5.8/10 while Bank of New York Mellon Corp (BNY) scores 8.1/10 on AlphaStocks' composite model. Bank of New York Mellon Corp has the higher composite rating of Strong Buy. On a P/E basis, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. trades at 8.3x, making it the more attractively priced of the two.
This comparison is algorithmically generated and is not financial advice.
| Metric | APAM | BNY |
|---|---|---|
| Scores & Fundamentals | ||
| Composite Score | 5.8/10 | 8.1/10▲ |
| Rating | Consider Buy | Strong Buy▲ |
| Price | $36.66 | $153.81 |
| P/E Ratio | 8.3▲ | 19.9 |
| ROE | 69.1%▲ | 12.6% |
| Market Cap | $2B | $107B |
| Fair Value | — | $148.97 |
| Dividend Yield | 10.7%▲ | 1.5% |
| Sector Rank | #143 of 265 | #4 of 265▲ |
| Model Verdicts | ||
| Piotroski | Strong | Strong |
| Buffett | Attractive | Strong▲ |
| Graham | Attractive▲ | Neutral |
| Lynch | Strong▲ | Neutral |
| Greenblatt | Strong▲ | Caution |
Related comparisons
APAM vs BNY: Which Stock Scores Higher?
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and Bank of New York Mellon Corp (BNY) are both in the Financials sector. BNY currently leads with a composite score of 8.1/10 (Strong Buy) compared to APAM's 5.8/10 (Consider Buy).
The AlphaStocks composite score evaluates each stock across four dimensions: Quality (business strength measured by Piotroski F-Score and Buffett quality criteria), Value (discount to intrinsic worth using Graham, Lynch, and Greenblatt models), Momentum (6-month price trend), and Timing (a confirmation signal that requires both value and momentum to align). A higher composite score indicates stronger overall fundamentals combined with favorable market conditions.
This comparison uses the same scoring framework for both companies, ensuring an apples-to-apples evaluation. Scores are recalculated daily after market close using data from SEC filings and market prices. Read the full methodology to understand how each model contributes to the composite score.
Scores are algorithm-generated research tools, not investment recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own due diligence. Full disclaimer